http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/sep/20/mail-on-sunday-apologises-for-muslim-gangs-attack-immigration-van-story

This article is about a misunderstood statement against a group of Muslim boys in hoodies, that vandalised an immigration enforcement car. It was said that 'Muslim gang slashes tyres of immigration-raid can before officers were showered with eggs from high rise'. This caused great controversy as the audience believed that the articles was negatively targeting the Muslim community, instead of the individuals.
- An article on July 26th said a gang of Muslim youths was responsible for damaging Home Office immigration enforcement vehicles in Shadwell, east London, in the week the prime minister appealed Muslims to help combat extremism.
- The mail on Sunday agrees to rewrite the story to remove the references to Muslims
- The coverage of Muslims in mainstream media continues to be very negative and there are too many sensationalist headlines that generalise about Muslims.
In my opinion, I would argue that this is just practically racism as they have targeted all the Muslims rather than just the individuals who had vandalised the immigration officers car. They emphasising the fact that all Muslims are bad, which makes me feel upset as being an Asian individual.
Ad blockers are wreaking havoc with the online revenue of newspapers

- 20% of advertising revenue made by mobile advertising
- Ad blocker causing a decrease of the revenue for more industries
- the newspaper continues to go into a revenue decline






I completely agree with this comment, Google has excelled in terms of providing us all with wider content and more global stories. Furthermore, as he states, Google has been a stepping stone for many bloggers and talented writers, ultimately allowing the public to receive better content.
"Obviously, Google is not to blame. I don’t think it’s about blame. I think the Internet is incredibly poorly designed. Rather than being free, everything on it should cost something in order to compensate creators."
I disagree with this comment as I don't believe the internet should be "payed for" just to "compensate creators", the public has to pay for broadband at home, and data on their phones etc, so in a way they are paying for the internet as they have to pay for it themselves to access it. So I disagree as to why the public should have to pay more just to find out what is happening around the world globally.